Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga on Ubuntu using DSL

[Eugen Dedu <Eugen Dedu pu-pm univ-fcomte fr>]

kapetr wrote:
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:08:00 +1100
>> From: mat101 <matthews632 netspace net au>
>> To: Ekiga mailing list <ekiga-list gnome org>
>> Subject: Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga on Ubuntu using DSL
>> 302G D-Link modem
>> Message-ID: <4B872D00 8040403 netspace net au>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
>> Thanks for the response Rob.
>>
>> kapetr also suggested that I try an iptel.org sip account
>> with twinkle -
>> it works well. The server-side STUN service of iptel.org
>> may be the
>> important factor that allows DSL modems to conduct
>> a voip interaction.
>> I'll try using the same sip account with Ekiga when
>> time allows. Thanks
>> for the advice.
>>
>> Cheers.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> The working of twinkle is NOT due to iptel workaround. Twinkle works
> without problems with ANY account I have try, even with ekiga account.
> 
> The reason is simple - in twinkle is STUN support not buggy :-)
> So I have NOT to make some port forwarding, ...
> It just works, why twinkle send to the communication partner proper public
> (from outside accesable) pair  IP/PORT resolved by STUN request/replay.
> Thats all.
> 
> If ekiga would do the same, as it should, it wold be working too.
> 
> See my report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ekiga/+bug/517580
> 
> Check the wireshark output - see SDP in INVITE packet !
> 
> Ekiga works with only (really ONLY) iptel account and only when calling
> something on iptel. To make call somewhere else is (of course) not possible.
> 
> BTW - the workaround by iptel I have described in previous post.  
> 
> I have spend many hours in studying wireshark and twinkle logs, and I
> 99,999% sure, I'm right: Ekiga can't work behind comon ((port)restricted)
> NAT.

kapetr, it seems the issue you described has just been fixed by Robert
with
http://opalvoip.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opalvoip/opal/trunk/src/rtp/rtp.cxx?r1=24129&r2=24128&pathrev=24129.
 Could you apply this patch in opal and test it *as soon as possible*?

-- 
Eugen