Re: [Ekiga-list] Status of Win port

[Eugen Dedu <Eugen Dedu pu-pm univ-fcomte fr>]

Michael Rickmann wrote:
> Am Montag, den 13.04.2009, 09:27 +0200 schrieb Eugen Dedu:
> > Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > > Eugen Dedu wrote:
> > > > "VFW support is still not visible even though ptlib is built with VFW 
> > > > enabled." - I suppose this is still true...
> > > >
> > > > Fails to register: Could you send us a -d 4 output?  (I haven't seen 
> > > > any, sorry)
> > > Here's the -d4 output. I've also attached a "vfw" log in that I clicked 
> > You have the same problem as Michael R.: STUN is not enabled and ekiga 
> > tries to register through a private address, so you receive an error.
> >
> > Let me think why STUN is not enabled in windows...
> >
> > > "Detect Devices" and the log shows what PTLib thinks of my system. You 
> > > can see "PTLIB/VideoForWindows" being output.
> > I do not know this kind of things.  Snark, could you help here?
> Currently, the STUN related sequence of events during win32 startup is:
> 1) notifiers from the config file are added (gmconf-glib.c)
> 2) notifiers are called via g_idle_add (gmconf-glib.c) including
> disable_stun false
> 3) Opal::CallManager::start (opal-call-manager.cpp) finds stun_enabled
> false and does not start the StunDetector.
> 4) ConfBridge::on_property_changed (opal-gmconf-bridge.cpp) calls
> manager.set_stun_enabled to set stun_enabled.
> I have attached a gdb log which shows this. It appears that enabling
> stun comes to late for the CallManager which gives us only a single
> chance for stun detection. The delay is probably caused by the glib idle
> loop. I just found that taking out all the idle stuff from gmconf-glib.c
> (see attached patch) lets me connect to ekiga.net. However, I do not
> know the reason, why the notification was pushed in to the idle loop
> originally.

It appears that the revision which introduced this error is 
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/ekiga/trunk/lib/engine/components/opal/opal-call-manager.cpp?r1=7469&r2=7481, 
is that right?  If it is simple to you only, could you just revert that 
revision and see the result?

--
Eugen