Re: [Ekiga-list] symmetric nat traversal

[Christopher Priest <christopherpriest yahoo com>]

This presentation on symmetric traversal via port prediction and hole punching states 9 router combinations were tested. 3 were symmetric routers. One combination of routers worked 80% of the time and all the rest worked 100%.
http://www.hermitagesolutions.com/download/Outbound%20Datasheet.pdf

Christopher Priest  ChristopherPriest yahoo com


--- On Fri, 11/28/08, Martin Uecker <muecker gmx de> wrote:

> From: Martin Uecker <muecker gmx de>
> Subject: Re: [Ekiga-list] symmetric nat traversal
> To: "Ekiga mailing list" <ekiga-list gnome org>
> Date: Friday, November 28, 2008, 3:48 PM
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 07:40:24PM +0100, yannick wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> > 
> >
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teredo_tunneling#Limitations
> > 
> > Well, according to wikipedia, it seems toredo has the
> same limitations
> > as Ekiga currently has...
> 
> 
> There is an extension to the protocoll which supports
> symmetric NAT
> traversal. "Synteredo" or so, there was an IEEE
> paper about that.
> The miredo website claims support for symmetric NAT
> traversal:
> 
> 
> 19th August 2007 - Miredo 1.1.0
>     This is a test release with initial symmetric NAT
> traversal support,
> and various other minor enhancements and fixes. Note that
> it might not
> work too well on non-Linux systems - BSD support will be
> fixed later as
> the 1.1.x branch matures. 
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Martin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ekiga-list mailing list
> ekiga-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list