Re: [Ekiga-list] [Ekiga-devel-list] Call for testing our new ekiga.net platform



Damien Sandras wrote:
Hi,

Without feedback :
- do we consider that people are too lazy to test and that no test has
been done
- do we consider that it works well
?

Le mercredi 29 octobre 2008 à 23:19 +0100, yannick a écrit :
Hello,

We are currently in the process to switch the softwares used for the
ekiga.net service. Before the real switch, we need some people to test
it.

To use the improved service, you just need to configure ekiga 3.0 to use
an inbound proxy (in Edit -> Preferences -> SIP Settings -> Outbound
Proxy): set it as "ekiga.net:6060". The rest is just similar to the
current use of ekiga.net

You need to use the stable release of Ekiga 3.0 (3.0.0, or 3.0.1) to
test the new system. Our current Ekiga trunk (SVN) has its outbound
proxy broken at the moment.

We also have a new web interface to register accounts:
http://ekiga.net/yannick/weboser/
Warning: All new account created using this new web interface will be
deleted once we will do the real switch.

We are waiting your feedback.

Best regards,
Yannick

_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list
I would be delighted to assist in testing however, I've yet to succeed in building a runnable version of 3.0 (on Hardy) As I expressed in an email last year, I desperately need something like Ekiga using H264 to enable deaf users to control video/sound bandwidth and picture quality vs frame-rate (for lip-reading) . As this means installing on a variety of machines/operating systems, I see no real prospect of this until Ekiga becomes a simple one-step downloadable package. Please don't get me wrong, I think Damien, Yannick and others are doing a wonderful job and I'm extremely grateful for the (unpaid) effort that's going in but all the while it relies on a high degree of skill to actually get it going, Ekiga will remain in a tiny specialist backwater.

I used to have reasonable programming skills and at one stage was a UNIX system administrator and would help if I could (sadly I've forgotten too much I think) but it concerns me that if I think this is complex, what's it going to look like to an "average" user?

Much of the problem as I see it relates to the assumption that end users are aware of the function of the various dependencies (ptlib etc) and understand terms such as NAT and STUN etc. A simple glossary of terms may go a long way to de-mystifying the building process.

Apologies if this seems like a criticism, I'm a great fan but sometimes you have to stand back and look at it from a users point of view.


Regards John Hawley







[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]