Re: [Ekiga-list] privacy policy Ekiga



E Johnson wrote:
This endless "privacy policy" discussion is worse than tedious. It
sidetracks the developers, whose time is better spent in making Ekiga
better for us all.

In his initial post, Dirk wrote "I'm a skype user, but I'm thinking
about to try Ekiga." I fail to understand how a Skype user should
worry about this system, which is infinitely more secure.

And I am frankly surprised at how much time has been wasted here to
accommodate this discussion.

The privacy policy of Ekiga was stated several days ago by Damien:

"Only email addresses and first name / last name informations are
stored in a database. This information will not be made public or
given to third-parties."

It's very clear: they don't share your info. They only keep the
minimum of info necessary to make the system work for you.

Bottom line. Punt. Finito. End of story.

Let it go, people... if someone is so insecure, let him find a cave to
hide in alone. Let's stop wasting everyone's time, and let the
developers go back to doing their job.

Thanks very much,
Liz J
You seams to have a very narrow view of making a service like Ekiga is. It's more than just software (which is of course very important), it's also about making a good service, e.g. good program, good documentation, good support, a good website, good registration, good advertisement and in my opinion a good privacy policy.

Disappointing that you do not understand, even after a (using your words) endless discussion, the point yet. But I want to try to make it clear once more...

Fine, that the policy seems to be clear for you, me and maybe for more people on this list. I think the same clearness is necessary for *all *the (potential) users of Ekiga. That's not a waste of time but necessarily for a service like Ekiga and which will make Ekiga as a service even better and I suppose that's what also the developers want! Also it will give you a stronger position when potential users or reviewers compare Ekiga with for example Skype.


Dirk














On 3/20/08, ekiga-list-request gnome org <ekiga-list-request gnome org> wrote:
Send ekiga-list mailing list submissions to
        ekiga-list gnome org

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        ekiga-list-request gnome org

 You can reach the person managing the list at
        ekiga-list-owner gnome org

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than "Re: Contents of ekiga-list digest..."


 Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Privacy policy of Ekiga (schoappied)
   2. Re: Privacy policy of Ekiga (D Webb)
   3. Re: Privacy policy of Ekiga (schoappied)


 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

 Message: 1
 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:39:30 +0100
 From: schoappied <schoappied gmail com>
 Subject: Re: [Ekiga-list] Privacy policy of Ekiga
 To: Ekiga mailing list <ekiga-list gnome org>
 Message-ID: <47E23EE2 9030901 gmail com>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

 Stefan Monnier wrote:
 >>>>> I hope you will be able to point me to the privacy statements of
 >>>>> Ekiga or otherwise You will take this subject very seriously.
 >>>>>
 >>>> Are you talking about ekiga or ekiga.net?
 >>>>
 >>> I think both are really important, is it not?
 >>>
 >
 > Not really: the Ekiga application is just that: an application.
 > It happens to use the network, just like Firefox, but it doesn't
 > (modulo bugs or nasty people adding backdoors) connect to any machine
 > to which you haven't explicitly asked it to connect.
 >
 > I don't think a privacy statement is important here.
 >
 >
 >> You seem to assume that Ekiga is an organization, in the way that Skype
 >> is an organization.  It is not at all the same thing: Skype is a
 >> commercial organization with a proprietary product and service; Ekiga
 >> is an open source application, and there is a community that supports
 >> and uses it.  To use myself as an example, the only information that
 >> ekiga.net has access to are my name and email address.  There need be
 >> no privacy statement, since there is no collection of personal data,
 >> such as Skype might require and use.
 >>
 >
 > The fact that Ekiga.net is not commercial doesn't make much difference:
 > it does keep a database of users with their email address and names, and
 > (more importantly) it does keep track of which ones are connected and
 > from where, so it know about IP addresses and may potentially keep a log
 > of "when which user connected with which IP".
 >
 > And the police may order Damien to give out some of that info, or some
 > dire financial need (or juicy offer) may push Damien to sell that info.
 >
 > So a privacy statement explaining what info is kept (e.g. is a log of IP
 > addresses kept?), that to which it is intended (e.g. it's not intended
 > to be distributed to any third party, except the name database which is
 > freely searchable, IIUC), and the worst case guarantee (all the data may
 > be stolen, subpoena'd, sold, ...).
 >
 >
 >         Stefan
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > ekiga-list mailing list
 > ekiga-list gnome org
 > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list
 >
 >
 D Webb wrote:
 > I assume that everything I read, write, upload or download on the
 > Internet
 > and dates, times and IP addresses are being recorded by several
 > governmental agencies at any given moment. Thus far, I have rarely been
 > proven wrong. I assume everything I do on the Internet could just as well
 > have been shouted at the top of my lungs in a football stadium.
 >
 > It is in this sense that I think privacy statements, while being a
 > profitable
 > marketing gesture for a business, offers no more privacy than no
 > statement
 > at all. Let us say you are going to tell someone over Ekiga about some
 > terrible
 > crime you will commit. Do you really think you will escape police
 > intervention
 > or a prison sentence because of a privacy statement? I guess you could
 > try and file a lawsuit from a prison cell, but would it not be easier
 > to accept
 > my interpretation of VoIP as shouting in a football stadium?
 >
 > Finally, a lawyer could butt in and tell us all these complicated
 > issues and
 > scenarios and pitfalls, and the infinite variances in different
 > countries. Again,
 > would it not be easier to just assume you are shouting in a football
 > stadium
 > and just accept the Internet does not have much mercy for privacy?
 >
 > Dominic

 Of course the governments and police can get at a given time (as
 exception) access to data stored on the internet. But, at least in the
 Netherlands, also the government and the police have to respect laws and
 rules. So the comparison with information that is shouted in a stadium
 is not right here. It's also not a good attitude of the citizens of a
 country to just accept that everyone can violate your privacy. Citizens
 should put effort in making good rules for privacy or to protect it.
 Privacy is a human right of a democracy.

 And there is more then police and government. The police and government
 are not the first and also not the second reason to have a privacy
 policy.  The first reason is that you as a user, have the right to know
 what is happening with your given or received data. On the basis of the
 policy you can decide whether or not you are going to use that service.
 So Ekiga as a service can at least give information how they handle the
 information with or without given guarantees. Second it is also good to
 know if a service will doing at least there best to take care about privacy.

 The fact that other service store information for a long time, set
 cookies, or even give or sell information to third parties
 (advertisement companies for example) makes a privacy policy useful or
 necessary for a service as Ekiga. I don't want a service that is
 gathering information and give it to third parties and so I like to know
 of Ekiga what there policy is in this case. And I think it is something
 that a service like Ekiga should have, because it is important how a
 service is dealing with your (private) information (I don't like to find
 my chatsession with my girlfriend to find on Google or that others can
 know who I'm calling at which times).

 The argument that privacy statements or policies is only profitable
 marketing is something which is not true. I can't see why it should
 Ekiga costs money to have just written down there privacy policy. I
 think too that a privacy policy is not the same as a guarantee, it would
 be nice if it was, but inform your users about the privacy policy of the
 service and doing the best to protect the privacy of the 'users' is in
 itself a good thing.


 Dirk











 ------------------------------

 Message: 2
 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:07:00 +0000
 From: D Webb <dlw_insulin hotmail com>
 Subject: Re: [Ekiga-list] Privacy policy of Ekiga
 To: Ekiga mailing list <ekiga-list gnome org>
 Message-ID: <BLU130-W31231DDC88A8347412741A85000 phx gbl>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


 > rules. So the comparison with information that is shouted in a stadium
 > is not right here. It's also not a good attitude of the citizens of a
 > country to just accept that everyone can violate your privacy. Citizens
 > should put effort in making good rules for privacy or to protect it.
 > Privacy is a human right of a democracy.

 Right, wrong, the law and self-preservation are 4 different things with
 infinite permutations of interpretation. Please consider thinking of your
 privacy much like your bicycle, you from the Netherlands. You will want
 laws to punish bicycle thieves AND a strong lock. The law exists because
 there are people who do not follow it. I expect privacy laws and the
 corresponding violators to co-exist. I do not see privacy statements
 helping much.

 Dee



 _________________________________________________________________
 Windows Live Hotmail is giving away Zunes.
 http://www.windowslive-hotmail.com/ZuneADay/?locale=en-US&ocid=TXT_TAGLM_Mobile_Zune_V3
 -------------- next part --------------
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: /archives/ekiga-list/attachments/20080320/273de28b/attachment.html

 ------------------------------

 Message: 3
 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:42:28 +0100
 From: schoappied <schoappied gmail com>
 Subject: Re: [Ekiga-list] Privacy policy of Ekiga
 To: Ekiga mailing list <ekiga-list gnome org>
 Message-ID: <47E24DA4 4040605 gmail com>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

 D Webb wrote:
 > > rules. So the comparison with information that is shouted in a stadium
 > > is not right here. It's also not a good attitude of the citizens of a
 > > country to just accept that everyone can violate your privacy. Citizens
 > > should put effort in making good rules for privacy or to protect it.
 > > Privacy is a human right of a democracy.
 >
 > Right, wrong, the law and self-preservation are 4 different things with
 > infinite permutations of interpretation. Please consider thinking of your
 > privacy much like your bicycle, you from the Netherlands. You will want
 > laws to punish bicycle thieves AND a strong lock. The law exists because
 > there are people who do not follow it. I expect privacy laws and the
 > corresponding violators to co-exist. I do not see privacy statements
 > helping much.
 >
 > Dee
 >
 I think you're right on this point, although Ekiga should, in my
 opinion, do there best to protect my information against potential
 violators....

 But it seems that you not really understand what I was trying to say.
 It's not only about protecting information against violators outside,
 but as a user I want to know the policy of* Ekiga itself.* What are they
 doing with my information. That's what I want to know before I will use
 a service like Ekiga. And I think they should put there policy, like
 many other comparable services, on there website.

 Privacy for a internet service like Ekiga is an important issue. That's
 why I was a little surprised by the reaction of developer Damien (with
 respect), who said that he finds writing a privacy policy boring or
 hasn't enough time for it. I think if you're offering a service like
 this and like to have a lot of users, the first thing you should do is
 doing your best to protect your users against violations of all kind and
 give them information about how you deal with the privacy of your users.
 That's at least the right your users have.

 I like to help spreading the word about Ekiga, but I'd like to do that
 with the knowledge that the service has a good and open privacy policy.

 Kind regards,

 Dirk













 ------------------------------

 _______________________________________________
 ekiga-list mailing list
 ekiga-list gnome org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list

 End of ekiga-list Digest, Vol 20, Issue 38
 ******************************************

_______________________________________________
ekiga-list mailing list
ekiga-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-list




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]