Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] pixmap package name
- From: Eugen Dedu <Eugen Dedu pu-pm univ-fcomte fr>
- To: Ekiga development mailing list <ekiga-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] pixmap package name
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 12:18:11 +0100
On 06/02/14 21:42, Eugen Dedu wrote:
On 01/02/14 17:09, Damien Sandras wrote:
Le 26/01/14 19:58, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
On 25/01/14 16:06, Damien Sandras wrote:
Le 25/01/14 15:22, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
On 25/01/14 14:45, Damien Sandras wrote:
Le 23/01/14 14:04, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
In pixmaps/Makefile.am, the word ekiga is used twice. Shouldn't
PACKAGE_NAME
be used instead?
You can change it if you prefer.
In order to have both stable and unstable packages on my machine, I
change the
name to ekiga-snapshot. The modification I proposed should help,
in my
opinion. I will do it.
I have just done it.
I think there is an error in pixmap/Makefile.am file:
IMAGES_FILES= \
[...]
inlines.h: $(IMAGE_FILES) $(nobase_dist_icon_DATA) Makefile.am
Shouldn't the last line use IMAGES_FILES instead of IMAGE_FILES?
There is no
other IMAGE_FILES in whole ekiga code.
Yes, but it raises the question : is inlines.h still used at all ?
I think not...
It is used in lib/gui/gmstockicons.c.
Fixed (and tested) with
https://git.gnome.org/browse/ekiga/commit/?id=ca309540b471.
--
Eugen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]