Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] pixmap package name

[Eugen Dedu <Eugen Dedu pu-pm univ-fcomte fr>]

On 01/02/14 17:09, Damien Sandras wrote:
> Le 26/01/14 19:58, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
> > On 25/01/14 16:06, Damien Sandras wrote:
> > > Le 25/01/14 15:22, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
> > > > On 25/01/14 14:45, Damien Sandras wrote:
> > > > > Le 23/01/14 14:04, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
> > > > > > In pixmaps/Makefile.am, the word ekiga is used twice. Shouldn't PACKAGE_NAME
> > > > > > be used instead?
> > > > > You can change it if you prefer.
> > > >
> > > > In order to have both stable and unstable packages on my machine, I change the
> > > > name to ekiga-snapshot.  The modification I proposed should help, in my
> > > > opinion.  I will do it.
> >
> > I have just done it.
> >
> > I think there is an error in pixmap/Makefile.am file:
> >
> > IMAGES_FILES= \
> > [...]
> > inlines.h: $(IMAGE_FILES) $(nobase_dist_icon_DATA) Makefile.am
> >
> > Shouldn't the last line use IMAGES_FILES instead of IMAGE_FILES? There is no
> > other IMAGE_FILES in whole ekiga code.
> Yes, but it raises the question : is inlines.h still used at all ?
>
> I think not...

It is used in lib/gui/gmstockicons.c.

What do you think, Julien?

--
Eugen