Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] What's missing for 4.0.1

[Eugen Dedu <Eugen Dedu pu-pm univ-fcomte fr>]

On 19/02/13 18:36, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > what are the showstoppers for 4.0.1 ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ptlib/opal:
> > > > > > > - double call in history
> > > > > > > - options not sent anymore
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ekiga:
> > > > > > > - freeze on quit on windows
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not release bugs, but useful to have:
> > > > > > > - problem with video camera non-ascii
> > > > > > > - do not use user names in OPTIONS
> > > > > > > - check e-mail resume audio (see mailing list)
> > > > > > > - check e-mail peer removal issue (see mailing list)
> > > > > > > - register correctly after suspend/resume
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 3 bugs have just been fixed, now the list is:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ekiga:
> > > > > > - freeze on quit on windows
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not blockers, but useful to have:
> > > > > > - problem with video camera non-ascii
> > > > > > - check e-mail resume audio (see mailing list)
> > > > > > - check e-mail peer removal issue (see mailing list)
> > > > > > - register correctly after suspend/resume
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > One more bug fixed, now the list is:
> > > > >
> > > > >    >   - freeze on quit on windows
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ok, this one has finally been fixed.  It remains a small regression with
> > > > right-clicking in roster, and we will release.  So expect it for
> > > > tomorrow.
> > >
> > >
> > > Just a head up that we currently fail to build in F19 due to a new
> > > boost and gcc release.
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912503
> >
> >
> > As Damien says, all these seem errors in C++ classes or boost. Moreover, gcc
> > 4.8.0 will be branched in March probably, so a release will appear maybe in
> > April.  This bug can wait a bit, until gcc itself or boost is stabilised.
>
> well gcc 4.8 is in regressions only and the developers believe it's
> pretty close to final so if it's a change there it's a reason for it,
> it could be boost. I'm can cope with it waiting for 4.0.2 but be aware
> people that are using rawhide are already moaning about it and the
> build only failed a couple of days ago.

I let Damien and Julien look into it, since I do not understand well 
where the problem is.  I also looked over changes in gcc 4.8.0 and seen 
nothing about such error.

--
Eugen