Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] ekiga.rc
- From: Michael Cronenworth <mike cchtml com>
- To: Ekiga development mailing list <ekiga-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] ekiga.rc
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:17:53 -0500
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] ekiga.rc
From: Michael Rickmann <mrickma gwdg de>
To: Ekiga development mailing list <ekiga-devel-list gnome org>
Date: 04/20/2009 11:54 AM
Yes, I have seen that. I am still testing. Would something like
#define EKIGA_REVISION "EKIGA_3_2_0-80-g80bf6d3" be acceptable in
revisioin.h? It is based on the output of git describe, the 80th
revision of tag EKIGA_3_2_0 I guess.
You cannot do this. Git does not use revision numbers. It uses a commit
*hash* for tracking. Don't rely on Git hashes. Define another version
number and use that.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]