Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] 1st working SVN build Ekiga on FreeBSD



El día Monday, April 07, 2008 a las 12:55:14PM +0200, Matthias Schneider escribió:

> Hi Emilio,
> could you try to change  in file opal/src/opal/patch.cxx
> 
>   452     if (!isSynchronous)
>   453       PThread::Sleep(5);
> 
> to
> 
>   452     //if (!isSynchronous)
>   453       PThread::Sleep(5);
> 
> i.e. that sleep is executed everytime?

I've changed the part to:

    // Matthias Schneider <matthias schneider TU-Ilmenau DE> asked me, Emilio, to comment
    // out the if(...)
    PTRACE(1, "Debug: src/opal/patch.cxx: PThread::Sleep(5)");
    // if (!isSynchronous)
      PThread::Sleep(5);

and run 'ekiga --sync -d 1'; as you can see it is passing this place with
high frequency, but never sleeps:

2008/04/07 13:24:37.077   0:45.236       Media Patch:0x2bc60a00 Debug: src/opal/patch.cxx: PThread::Sleep(5)
2008/04/07 13:24:37.092   0:45.251       Media Patch:0x29bd5100 Debug: src/opal/patch.cxx: PThread::Sleep(5)
2008/04/07 13:24:37.094   0:45.253       Media Patch:0x2bc60800 Debug: src/opal/patch.cxx: PThread::Sleep(5)
2008/04/07 13:24:37.113   0:45.272       Media Patch:0x29bd5100 Debug: src/opal/patch.cxx: PThread::Sleep(5)
2008/04/07 13:24:37.125   0:45.284       Media Patch:0x2bc60a00 Debug: src/opal/patch.cxx: PThread::Sleep(5)
2008/04/07 13:24:37.126   0:45.285       Media Patch:0x2bc60800 Debug: src/opal/patch.cxx: PThread::Sleep(5)
2008/04/07 13:24:37.135   0:45.294       Media Patch:0x29bd5100 Debug: src/opal/patch.cxx: PThread::Sleep(5)
2008/04/07 13:24:37.156   0:45.315       Media Patch:0x29bd5100 Debug: src/opal/patch.cxx: PThread::Sleep(5)
2008/04/07 13:24:37.158   0:45.317       Media Patch:0x2bc60800 Debug: src/opal/patch.cxx: PThread::Sleep(5)

	Emilio
-- 
Matthias Apitz
Manager Technical Support - OCLC GmbH
Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e <matthias apitz oclc org> - w http://www.oclc.org/ http://www.UnixArea.de/
b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/
Don't top-post, read RFC1855 http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]