Re: dogtail-devel Proposal: splitting out the app wrappers into a separate tarball/repo, and how to organize dogtail-tests
- From: David Malcolm <dmalcolm redhat com>
- To: Zack Cerza <zcerza redhat com>
- Cc: dogtail-devel-list gnome org, build-brigade-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: dogtail-devel Proposal: splitting out the app wrappers into a separate tarball/repo, and how to organize dogtail-tests
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:04:07 -0400
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 17:05 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 13:04 -0400, Zack Cerza wrote:
> > David Malcolm wrote:
> > > [cross-posting to build-brigade-list as I'd like feedback on how best to
> [snip]
>
> > > - dogtail/apps/categories.py: my feeling is that this was an
> > > experiment, and can be moved elsewhere or got rid of
> I've removed this from CVS, and committed fixes to the wrappers to stop
> using it.
>
> I'm about to move the wrappers to a new appwrappers subdirectory of
> dogtail-tests. This will build as a python package which can live as a
> module in jhbuild, as a dependency of the tests that need it. I killed
> off some of the wrappers which were just stubs.
Done: see http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/dogtail-tests/appwrappers/
I can build this as an RPM, and it adds the wrappers inside the dogtail
module:
>>> import dogtail.appwrappers.evolution
Detecting distribution: Red Hat/Fedora/derived distribution
GTK Accessibility Module initialized
I haven't yet checked this with jhbuild.
Next I'll be moving most of the dogtail examples from dogtail to
appropriate subdirectories of the dogtail-tests module
Hope this helps
Dave
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]