Re: UML-Conformity



Am Freitag, 18. Juni 2004 02:58 schrieb Andrew Ross:
On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 02:52, RittervomNie web de wrote:
I wouldn't switch it off, since that would no doubt result in a bug
filed to have it added as a feature, even though it's already there
(although it could do with some improvement). There is already a bug
or two filed about text placement (roles, association names, and
multiplicities) for UML associations and messages:

The thing to do (and I'm mentioning this in bug 65430) is to have a
default placement but also a handle so the user can adjust it.  Such a
handle is used in several other objects.  The switch between
automatically placed and user-placed should be controlled in the same
way as auto-routing for zig-zag lines.  Good little project for
somebody with a bit of time on their hands.

On the other hand these properties are usless. I must use the text
element to display multiplicities, roles and message names.

Why would you need the text element, when the only issue with
multiplicities, roles, message names etc is their poor automatic
placement? The two bugs I previously mentioned (65430 and 118313) raise
two different approaches to solving this problem (improve automatic
placement, and provide a manual placement option), and it looks both
will (eventually) be implemented - yay!

Hooray for bug sollutions. I'm quite correct when it comes to multiplicities. 
Only a hollow or filled diamond is not enough for me, I want zeros, n-s and 
m-s and that stuff. Imagine some for-loop in sequence diagrams, messages with 
repetition counts, if-s and stuff. When using actual versions I have to 
emulate this by text elements to give a complete description of sequences or 
entity-container-relationships...

Poor alignment makes a diagram unreadable. Multiplicities drawn within classes 
are not quite good. And messages with off-cut underlength letters 
(underscore, characters like g) are also hard to read. So I need a 
workaround. Using the text element is the only way...until these bugs will be 
fixed.

Cheers

Andrew

_______________________________________________
Dia-list mailing list
Dia-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
FAQ at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia/faq.html
Main page at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]