Re: 0.92-pre1



On 4 Sep 2003, Alan Horkan wrote:

On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Steffen Macke wrote:

Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 07:03:41 +0300
From: Steffen Macke <sdteffen web de>
Reply-To: dia-list gnome org
To: dia-list gnome org
Subject: Re: 0.92-pre1

A windows installer of 0.92-pre1 is available from

http://dia-installer.sourceforge.net

Thank you.  Prebuilt binaries are always a huge help, particularly on
Windows.

The first sheets, which is the Assorted Shapes does not load at startup.
The space where you would normally see the shapes is blank, but if you
select the sheet again it loads correctly.

I realise adding this option to the installer could be quite difficult
but I would really like it if the installer allowed me to choose not to
install the localisations/translations.  It would save me manually
deleting them, and they take up 4 MB (Dia 0.90 only took up about 6MB in
total).  With previous releases I was able to delete all the translation
files I dont need without causing any problems this time it does cause
problems which I will try and look into later.

The Dynamic grid works well and is a significant improvement, but it
makes Snap to Grid a bit more confusing.

Any idea for how Snap to Grid could be less confusing with Dynamic Grid?

If you use the Document Menubar the Input Methods menu is blank (i
mentioned this before but neglected to file a bug report).

I tried switching Input Methods to Amharic but it failed
(dia.exe:4294205835): Gtk-WARNING **: Loading IM context type 'am_et'
failed
The previous time I tried it Dia crashed.
Strange little detail I had not noticed before, the Input Methods menu is
missing its tearoff (also missing in 0.91).

Yeah, that whole thing is broken in menu-bar-mode.  Since it's going to
disappear entirely in the next version, I'm not going to spend days looking
for a reason.

samples/EML-demo.dia should be removed, as the shapes it needs were
removed

True.

I am reminded of lots of other things including:
should the diagram tree just show the current document?

I don't see why it should.

wouldn't it be nice to be able to set the default number of sides/points
on a Polygon/Polyline/Beziergon/Bezier/ZigZagline?

How would they be laid out by default, then?

why doesn't the Polyline have connection points on it, and why not
replace the Standard Line with single "PolyLine"?

There's actually little reason to have a seperate Line when we have
PolyLine, that's true.  A Box is still useful in the precense of a Polygon
because of the extra restrictions.

-Lars

-- 
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| HÃrdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I   |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it."   | Where are we going, and
    --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire  | what's with the handbasket?



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]