Re[2]: EPS export
- From: Alan G Isaac <aisaac american edu>
- To: dia-list gnome org
- Subject: Re[2]: EPS export
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 15:22:51 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Le Tue, Sep 24, 2002, à 11:30:52AM -0400, Alan G Isaac a écrit:
But more to the point, for an EPS file I
believe the convention is to set
%%Pages 0 (rather than 1).
(See p.43 of the DSC spec.)
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:39:42 +0200 Cyrille Chepelov <cyrille chepelov org> wrote:
Is this spec downloadable somewhere?
http://partners.adobe.com/asn/developer/technotes/postscript.html
See Technical Notes 5001 (p.43) and especially 5002.
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:39:42 +0200 Cyrille Chepelov <cyrille chepelov org> wrote:
To summarise, you would like the DSC header in EPS to mention "%%Pages 0"
rather than "%%Pages 1", and the DSC header in PS to provide both "%%Pages
<total>" and one "%%Page <num>" per page. Is this correct?
Correct for PS.
If the %%Pages: comment must be included in the EPS file,
then correct there too. But I would prefer to just leave
it out of the EPS file.
Le Tue, Sep 24, 2002, à 11:30:52AM -0400, Alan G Isaac a écrit:
PS Is there any real reason not to use
the 'selectfont' operator?
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:39:42 +0200 Cyrille Chepelov <cyrille chepelov org> wrote:
Is this related to 0.90, or to CVS?
I have no idea. I am just observing that selectfont is
considered more efficient than the older findfont,
scalefont, setfont combination. The EPS files produced
by Dia use the latter.
Cheers,
Alan
PS I will copy you on a query to the PostScript users group,
since I find a little ambiguity in the specs about the
%%Pages: comment.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]