Hello Javier,
Although your comment is valuable, my opinion is that we should be
focusing on adding coverage to mago, rather than keeping adding stuff
to the framework itself.
Do you see a real benefit that would worth the effort?
Cheers,
Ara.
On 22/09/09 11:19, Javier Collado wrote:
Hello,
While looking at a merge proposal, I saw a pattern that was repeated multiple times:
if <condition>:
raise AssertionError, <comment>
I understand that the use of "assert" statement in a testing library is
discouraged since it isn't executed when optimizations are activated so the
if/raise lines here are completely fine.
However, I was thinking that as many testing libraries provide their own
assertion methods, perhaps mago TestSuite base class should do it also. Do you
agree on this? Do you think is there any other behaviour that would be worth to add?
Best regards,
Javier
_______________________________________________
http://live.gnome.org/DesktopTesting
desktop-testing-list mailing list
desktop-testing-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-testing-list
|
