Re: Chrome Remote Desktop Support for GNOME/Wayland
- From: Christopher Davis <christopherdavis gnome org>
- To: "S ." <salmanmk live com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Chrome Remote Desktop Support for GNOME/Wayland
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:27:13 -0800
Hello Salman,
You might want to share this on the GNOME Discourse. Generally the community has moved away from mailing lists, and instead questions like these are posted to Discourse. This has the benefit of being easier to use and preserving conversation history in a nicer format.
Regards,
Christopher Davis
On Tue, Jan 25 2022 at 04:30:26 PM +0000, S . via desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org> wrote:
Hi All,
(Please feel free to advise of appropriate mailing list if you think this doesn't fit here)
I am looking into supporting CRD for GNOME/wayland. CRD would be leveraging remote desktop APIs (along with screencast) as exposed by xdg-desktop-portal{,-gnome}. While experimenting with remote desktop APIs, I see that for enhanced security, an interactive
dialog (relevant code:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/xdg-desktop-portal-gnome/-/blob/main/src/screencast.c#L345-349) is always presented to the user to select sources/devices they want to allow to be remote controlled. Though this workflow would make perfect sense when a user
is directly connected to the machine and is allowing someone remote to take control (e.g. to get help from IT) but it is less than ideal for a user who is trying to access their own machine remotely (e.g. accessing their work computer from home).
I would like to hear ideas from the GNOME community about how to best support the latter use case for remote desktop. Is there a secure way to bypass the dialog/prompt selectively for apps? There seems to be recent support for restoring the capture streams
(if persistence was demanded previously by the user) using flatpak permission store:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/xdg-desktop-portal-gnome/-/merge_requests/14 but remembering streams for remote desktop session is explicitly disallowed in the portal frontend (
https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/blob/master/src/screen-cast.c#L589-L594
-- though this doesn't seem to be GNOME specific). Is it reasonable to extend the stream restoration support to work for remote desktop sessions as well as pre-populating the permission store to allow remote desktop session (so that user intervention can be
avoided)? Also, would pre-populating the permission store work for system installation of CRD or would only work for flatpak/sandboxed version of the app?
Would love to hear thoughts from the community about the best way forward.
Thanks,
Salman
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]