Re: I believe we should reconsider our sys-tray removal
- From: Ty Young <youngty1997 gmail com>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: I believe we should reconsider our sys-tray removal
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 15:50:00 -0500
On 4/22/19 9:42 AM, Shaun McCance wrote:
I can't speak to the rest of this long email, but I can clarify one
thing:
On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 18:05 -0500, Ty Young via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
A) Calling "activities" the "overview". These are used
interchangeably. Search "overview" in Gnome Software and you will get
extensions that affect "activities" and call "activities" the
"overview". While I made a mistake and switched to overview it is
still technically correct(or at least no one can agree on what to
call it).
The screen you get when you click Activities or use the hot corner is
called "the Activities overview". That's what it's called (or should be
called) in all official documentation. If random redditers just say
"activities" or "the overview" in casual conversation, that doesn't
particularly bother me. It would be nice if extension developers would
use the correct term in their descriptions though.
--
Shaun
Thanks for the clarification Shaun. This is known by all Gnome 3
developers correct? If so, why was no correction ever made and the
trolling and "poor discussion" allowed(and still is) to continue? Why
are the rules of the official Gnome 3 subreddit applied only when the
moderators feel like it? Why are articles/blog/discussion posts
discussing Gnome 3 in a negative light being removed even though they do
not break any of the mobile-only-visible rules?
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]