Re: Meson feedback as a user
- From: Iñigo Martínez <inigomartinez gmail com>
- To: desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Meson feedback as a user
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 11:06:29 +0100
Just on my own experience, based on the packages I've ported:
* -Dgtk_doc=true
* -Dintrospection=true
* -Dman=true
* -Dconsolekit=false
There is only a minor quirk with this, which is `vala`, because it's a
reserved option name.
Anyway, a common glossary would be welcome, so that not only the
naming scheme is consistent between the different packages, but also
the names themselves.
Best regards,
2017-11-27 10:49 GMT+01:00 Richard Hughes <hughsient gmail com>:
On 24 November 2017 at 14:49, Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com> wrote:
- Drop the "enable" from --enable-foo boolean options; Meson has
boolean values, so -Denable-foo=true would read as redundant, and
-Denable-foo=false would read as contradictory. Use -Dfoo=true or
-Dfoo=false instead
I'm guilt of this, I'll fix up my projects, but before I do is there
any list of best practices? e.g. should it be
* -Dgtk_doc=true, -Dgtkdoc=true or -Ddocs=true?
* -Dintrospection=true or -Dgobject_introspection=true?
* -Dman=true or -Dman_pages=true
* -Dconsolekit=false or -DConsoleKit=false
Thanks,
Richard.
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]