Michael Catanzaro:
Why you think California is a better bet than improving GNOME Calendar?
Because GNOME Calendar for a long time has not even feature day or week views, which is compulsory for making daily schedules like these:
(http://i84.servimg.com/u/f84/16/19/87/90/screen10.png)See the same schedule as above in GNOME Calendar. It just piles up events, and you cannot see when a time frame ends and the next one starts:
(http://i84.servimg.com/u/f84/16/19/87/90/screen11.png) In California that works beautifully well: (http://i84.servimg.com/u/f84/16/19/87/90/screen12.png)In the end of the day I do not care about what is the application name, as long as daily scheduling works!
Do you think this is going to be included? Michael Catanzaro: > You linked to Ubuntu's downstream bugtracker; California uses > bugzilla.gnome.org for bug trackingI did that because all those reports in Launchpad were opened by me, and indicate the points I thought myself California was lacking:
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/california)
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
