Re: Keep shipping also generated gtk-doc html/ folder?

[Milan Crha <mcrha redhat com>]

On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 09:55 +0100, Philip Withnall wrote:
> If I remember correctly, it’s so that the tarballs can be unpacked to
> give documentation on developer.gnome.org without having to build
> anything.

        Hi,
I thought it would be to have the documentation available from any
system, for which my argument would be: "there is the online
documentation at developer.gnome.org, which is better than the one in
the tarball", but if it's true what you wrote, then it's the opposite
direction relationship.

I know there had been quite much buzz about the infrastructure
recently, I hope they won't dislike me, but maybe it would worth to
reconsider this and do build the devel-doc for the developer.gnome.org
site (easier to say, than to do, but maybe it could be extracted from
the Continuous builds?).

Also, it seem to me that it's the gtk-doc adding to the tarball that
folder and couple files, thus the place to focus any changes on might
be gtk-doc itself.
        Bye,
        Milan