Re: Rygel/GUPnP licensing

[Jens Georg <mail jensge org>]

> > Does anyone know whether I can just do a "soft" relicensing to
> > "proper"
> > LGPLv2.1+ by myself (the license says version 2 or later) to clean
> > this
> > up or whether I need to involve all contributing parties (oh dear)?
>
> Yes, go right ahead: this is why the "or later" clause exists. If the
> "or later" clause was absent, then this would be a pain and you
> wouldn't be able to do it on your own. (The same applies for the GPL,
> too.)

Thanks all, I thought so too, but wasn't really sure.