Re: Rygel/GUPnP licensing

[Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro gnome org>]

On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 12:19 +0100, Jens Georg wrote:
> Does anyone know whether I can just do a "soft" relicensing to
> "proper" 
> LGPLv2.1+ by myself (the license says version 2 or later) to clean
> this 
> up or whether I need to involve all contributing parties (oh dear)?

Yes, go right ahead: this is why the "or later" clause exists. If the
"or later" clause was absent, then this would be a pain and you
wouldn't be able to do it on your own. (The same applies for the GPL,
too.)

Michael