On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 16:43 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net> wrote:1) Does this variety of names create a real problem? For example, does it make using git-bz harder (remembering the version value, assuming you mostly develop against the latest code)? Do you care / do enough people use git-bz / do people not use git-bz because of this? Other reasons?It's a minor annoyance to have to load Bugzilla in a web browser to figure out the version to use when filing a bug with git-bz.
Agreed. I would actually call it a major annoyance, since it entirely breaks the git-bz workflow. I think I'm just being an old man though.
Note that as long as there is also no standardized General/general/Miscellaneous/misc component for all products, that would still need to be done anyway to figure out what Component to use when filing bugs with git-bz.
Actually, the components in a product can be queried using Bugzilla's XMLRPC API, and if hooked up to tab completion in git-bz, could be used from the command line: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742402
2) Shall we standardize this? (I volunteer to rename; "git master" seems to be the most popular option.) Or is that a waste of time?I think standardizing on 'git master' would be great. Thanks for volunteering.
Agreed. Philip
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part