Re: Announcement/RFC: jhbuild continuous integration testing
- From: Olav Vitters <olav vitters nl>
- To: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- Cc: GNOME release team <release-team gnome org>, desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Announcement/RFC: jhbuild continuous integration testing
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:45:55 +0100
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:23:52AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 10:59 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:53:17AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > The main issue that I see with this is that it's much harder to filter
> > > away/opt out, so it requires some broader consensus that we want to do
> > > this. We can still add a module blacklist if needed, though.
> >
> > I think build issues should be filed as Bugzilla bugs. At most we maybe
> > want to set some keyword / status whiteboard. But I guess the summary
> > would be consistent and people will quickly learn of it.
>
> They should be filed as Bugzilla bugs *after a timeout*. We already see
> build failures on ostree popping up on the #testable channel, and those
> are usually fixed in a timely manner.
Hmm, makes sense. Maybe start of small?
--
Regards,
Olav
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]