On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Luc Pionchon <pionchon luc gmail com> wrote:Wait - are you suggesting to create a fork each time a controversial
> The main point is that so-called "controversial" features does not have to
> be either a hard default, either rotting in a branch. They can be shipped as
> default, but with a way to revert them in the case they block the user.
change is made?