Re: PyGTK again (was: Apologize and to take PyGTK)

[Alexandre Franke <alexandre franke gmail com>]

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Germán Póo-Caamaño <gpoo gnome org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 15:52 -0400, Mike wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm glad to see both side of you calm down . I feel that this could be
> > a typical misunderstanding between users, package maintainers and the
> > upstream developers. Could we do anything about this?
> >
> > I suggest we could setup a activity graph for each modules in the git
> > repository. So people could see how active or inactive is a project
> > before or after they report a bug. This could also be helpful to track
> > inactive/dead projects for release management.
>
> Maybe you mean something like blip. http://blip.blip-monitor.com/
>
> (or a specific view of blip).

While it is a closed source web service, https://www.ohloh.net/ can
come in handy too.

--
Alexandre Franke