Re: GNOME goal for 3.8: Python 3 -- impact for pygobject itself
- From: Colin Walters <walters verbum org>
- To: Martin Pitt <martin pitt ubuntu com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME goal for 3.8: Python 3 -- impact for pygobject itself
- Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:12:39 -0500
See also:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658237
And the original train wreck:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=650763
If we don't have a concrete plan for how stuff like the shebang lines
work, the mess is just going to get worse. And ideally, we share
infrastructure (e.g. configure options) here between e.g. glib,
gobject-introspection, and pygobject. At present, all 3 behave
differently.
I think what I want is something like:
--with-python-major=2/3/auto
As I mentioned before, this is easier to work with for build systems and
more reliable than environment variables.
As far as the shebang problem above...we need some plan. I suggest
interested parties jump into the bug linked above.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]