Re: Some points about IM integration
- From: Juanjo Marín <juanjomarin96 yahoo es>
- To: "desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Some points about IM integration
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:55:01 +0100 (BST)
> De: Justin Wong <justin w xd gmail com>
>CC: desktop-devel-list gnome org
>Enviado: Martes 15 de Mayo de 2012 18:05
>Asunto: Re: Some points about IM integration
>
>
>Imagine, just imagine one day a desktop environment named the Kernel Desktop Environment (KDE), would be integrated to linux kernel for better user experience. U guys argue for kernel should not integrate a DE, then Linus Torvalds come out and say:
>
>On May 15, 2012 7:28 AM, "Owen Taylor" <otaylor redhat com> wrote:
>>
>> In general, choice of input method framework is not a goal in itself.
>> If we choose a single input method framework to integrate with GNOME -
>> that doesn't make GNOME like proprietary software from Apple and Microsoft,
>> because GNOME will still be 100% Free Software, and will still be developed
>> in the open by the GNOME community.
>>
>If we choose KDE as defualt and unchangable DE of linux, it doesn't make linux like proprietary software from micro$oft, because linux will still be 100% free software, and will still be developed in the open by the linux community.
>
>
>
Please, keep the focus on the problem: Providing a good input method support in GNOME.
The election of a single IM framework, or not, is a matter of implementation, that users
don't care as long as problem is solved and the solution can be maintained by the
community.
Cheers,
-- Juanjo Marin
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]