Re: fallback mode vs llvmpipe rendering
- From: Antoine Jacoutot <ajacoutot gnome org>
- To: Adam Jackson <ajax redhat com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: fallback mode vs llvmpipe rendering
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:12:25 +0200
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:08:11PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 17:36 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>
> > We have people working on llvmpipe/gallium/kms support for OpenBSD but
> > it takes time since we are not a large-scale project.
>
> llvmpipe has no kernel dependencies (beyond SSE2 support I guess), and I
> don't intend to change that. I do have a scheme in mind for a slightly
I know, it's just part of a common effort in our group, that's why I mentionned kms :)
We actually have llvmpipe working; but there is still an issue with cogl that we are trying to figure out.
> different build of the same code that would require a kernel memory
> manager, but that would not be done at the expense of the existing
Thanks for the info Adam.
--
Antoine
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]