Re: fallback mode vs llvmpipe rendering

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:08:11PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 17:36 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > We have people working on llvmpipe/gallium/kms support for OpenBSD but
> > it takes time since we are not a large-scale project.
> llvmpipe has no kernel dependencies (beyond SSE2 support I guess), and I
> don't intend to change that.  I do have a scheme in mind for a slightly

I know, it's just part of a common effort in our group, that's why I mentionned kms :)
We actually have llvmpipe working; but there is still an issue with cogl that we are trying to figure out.

> different build of the same code that would require a kernel memory
> manager, but that would not be done at the expense of the existing

Thanks for the info Adam.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]