Re: taking features away (compact view removed from Nautilus)
- From: Juanjo Marín <juanjomarin96 yahoo es>
- To: Allan Day <allanpday gmail com>, Federico Mena Quintero <federico gnome org>
- Cc: "desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: taking features away (compact view removed from Nautilus)
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 21:41:40 +0100 (BST)
----- Mensaje original -----
> De: Allan Day <allanpday gmail com>
> Para: Federico Mena Quintero <federico gnome org>
> CC: desktop-devel-list gnome org
> Enviado: Lunes 2 de julio de 2012 17:03
> Asunto: Re: taking features away (compact view removed from Nautilus)
>
> Federico Mena Quintero <federico gnome org> wrote:
> ...
>> The anti-pattern for both removals is like, "there's some peeling
> paint
>> in this house - let's bulldoze the neighborhood".
> ...
>
> How do you know that was the reason for the decision, if the
> background hasn't been explained? The anti-pattern for that statement
> is like, "assuming motivations out of ignorance".
>
That's the point of this thread, some decisions are taken and people make assumptions about the reasons behind based on the scarce info available.
I think we must find a better way of communicating these changes. It is a difficult problem to address because designing GNOME by comittee doesn't work and we really need the leadership and expertise of the design team to reach a good user experience. But on the other hand, without properly communication, we lose the opportunity to develop a design pattern language in the GNOME community.
I'm sorry for just point what I think that it is a problem without suggesting a defintive solution. I think Allan posts are very good explaining the design concepts and the new designs. Maybe this is the way to go.
Cheers,
-- Juanjo Marin
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]