Re: Module Proposal: Zeitgeist
- From: Sriram Ramkrishna <sri ramkrishna me>
- To: Florian Max <florian muellner gmail com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Module Proposal: Zeitgeist
- Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 12:57:17 -0700
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Florian Max
<florian muellner gmail com> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Emily Gonyer
<emilyyrose gmail com> wrote:
Then the design team ought to be more open about what exactly 'their' vision for gnome is, as well as open to other ideas/concepts. Insisting on doing things their way, while being extremely vague as to what exactly their way *is* is not helpful to the rest of the community who is trying to get stuff done.
First: the design team is very much trying to get stuff done, just like the "rest of the community". In fact, the design team is incredibly small (ergo: overworked). We have an extremely ambitious goal of creating an operating system, with just a handful of people doing design work towards that goal - compare that to the resources the likes of Apple or Microsoft put into their products to get an idea of the workload our folks have. I certainly have seen maintainers asking for design help on #gnome-design being turned down because no designer had any time to spend on yet-another-module.
I think we have a bit of a problem. Our core team has gotten smaller and thus overworked. Because of that they don't have that kind of time to do community management. I would even say that some of you are kinda grumpy. :-)
We really need to grow the number of good quality coders. Things like creating a lower bar of entry to code on GNOME is one aspect of an overall problem of getting new blood. It's why we have a perception of companies running the joint rather than a community.
GNOME as a project needs to concentrate on bringing in new volunteers so that we can expand the core team.
Which brings us to the matter of openness: the results of everything the design team does ends up on the GNOME wiki under
live.gnome.org/Design. Of course it would be really fancy if the wiki also contained the reasoning behind decisions, but let's face it -
Shaun opened up a new thread on this, I will pen my thoughts there.
Great thoughts, Florian. Thanks.
sri
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]