Re: Splitting gnome-utils for 3.4

[vinit agrawal <vender007 gmail com>]

Hi guys,

I support the idea of splitting the individual apps separately. Although the distribution will be tricky, but It will result in more serious development of individual apps, like baobab , which require more scanning capabilities and disk management. 

--Vinit

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com> wrote:

On 2011-09-21 at 13:47, Frederic Peters wrote:
> > Cosimo: the only issue I can think of when splitting up the repo are the
> > translations; currently, everything is translated into the same domain,
> > so we'll need the i18n teams to perform some surgery. we can probably do
> > it during the split (probably at the cost of the history), though.
>
> The translations shouldn't be an issue, the .po files will be
> duplicated in the new modules, with a lot of unnecessary strings, and
> those will be eliminated automatically in l10n.gnome.org since they
> won't be in the respective .pot file.

thanks for the answering my remaining doubt. :-)

ciao,
 Emmanuele.

--
W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name
B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi
_______________________________________________

gnome-utils-list mailing list
gnome-utils-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-utils-list