Le vendredi 13 mai 2011 à 15:49 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov a écrit : > If that is a bad excuse for the heated discussion, at least that > explains why it is hot. If I summarize the choice of Gnome Dev about panel by an exemple: The choice of operating system to boot at startup. They don't want to see a panel for manage Grub, a panel to manage Lilo, a panel to manage EFI, etc. But they want to see a generic panel make directly in Gnome Control Center and different back-end for each technologie. All that to have only one UI for all usage and don't break the logical of all Gnome UI. And if we more summarize: They don't want to have too much of redundant panels for same features and with different UI logic. They prefer to have 1 panel with some different back-end. I don't think this way is bad. Regards. -- Gendre Sebastien <korbe romandie com>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part