Re: Anyone using UNCONFIRMED in Bugzilla?

From: Fabio Duran Verdugo <fabiognome gmail com>
To: "pecisk gmail com" <pecisk gmail com>
Cc: d-d-l <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
Subject: Re: Anyone using UNCONFIRMED in Bugzilla?
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:37:25 -0300

On mar, 2011-12-27 at 16:48 +0200, pecisk gmail com wrote:
> Isn't UNCONFIRMED status meant for, you know, indication that
> developer haven't reproduced and verified this bug yet? For me NEW
> indicates that bug is found valid (from technical point of view) and
> needs fixing.
> 
> So please don't kill it. It's useful. 

I agree with this, It's useful, but my question is, how many developers
pay attention to NEW status? I dont know, in bugzilla I found 13754 bugs
with this status, and 28572 with UNCONFIRMED status. Maybe we need a new
policy...

References:
- Anyone using UNCONFIRMED in Bugzilla?
  - From: Olav Vitters
- Re: Anyone using UNCONFIRMED in Bugzilla?
  - From: pecisk gmail com

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]