Re: 3.2: gjs/seed

On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 10:38 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
> > One thing I'm not totally happy with is the organic growth in API in
> > both seed and gjs.  seed for example added an "os" module with e.g.
> > "fork" which I think is totally wrong; it's just broken to fork() a
> > GNOME app, since it conflicts with threads, etc.
> I cannot speak for the gjs/seed as I don't know its inner architecture
> but not every application 
> Regards

Please ignore last paragraph.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]