Re: GNOME 3 cleanup status update

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 20:59, Andy Wingo <wingo pobox com> wrote:
> Hi Tomeu,
> On Thu 14 Jan 2010 16:29, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu sugarlabs org> writes:
>> Pygi is still far away from being an usable replacement of static
>> bindings, at the current development rate.
> Why is that? Is the gobject-inspection metadata not expressive enough,
> or does pygi not implement all that gobject-introspection can express?

Pygi is incomplete, I don't think there is still an enormous amount of
work to be done, but there's almost zero people with time to work on
it currently. If there's interest, I can add a TODO list to the wiki.

As far as I know, g-i has everything we need now.



> Just curious,
> Andy
> --

«Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]