Re: Another build status update

[Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>]

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Matthias Clasen
<matthias clasen gmail com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 10:18 +0100, Juanjo Marin wrote:
>
>> Is it possible that those computers have a rather old version of
>> gdk-pixbuf? That function was added in June:
>> http://git.gnome.org/browse/gdk-pixbuf/commit/?id=330f9555cdb557abd7a5bfff4f4127bacd0653fc
>
> I'll have to check on the slave if the gtkmm build for some reason
> chooses to build against the system gdk-pixbuf. The jhbuild tree
> certainly contains a successful build of gdk-pixbuf git master.
>

Turns out this was caused by old gdk-pixbuf headers in the installed
tree, from before gdk-pixbuf was separated (ie under
$includedir/gtk-3.0/gdk-pixbuf) - those were found before the
standalone gdk-pixbuf headers.

The next rebuild should work better.