Re: Metacity towards GNOME 3.0
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Sam Spilsbury <smspillaz gmail com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Metacity towards GNOME 3.0
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 12:54:47 -0500
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 17:23 +0800, Sam Spilsbury wrote:
> > - We could just make it require GTK+ 3.0. This is my suggestion -
> > GNOME 3 is a GTK+ 3.0-based desktop. Metacity is the GNOME
> > (fallback) window manager. GTK+ 3.0 will be released as a
> > stable toolkit before Metacity 3.0 is released. If people need
> > to Metacity build against older GTK+, the older tarballs aren't
> > going to be removed from the website.
> >
> > If someone wants to use Metacity 3.0 in a legacy environment -
> > on an older operating system - the GSettings requirement, which we
> > can't get away from, would be a big problem.
> >
>
> Hi Owen,
>
> Does this mean that libmetacity-private will also depend on GTK+ 3.0 ?
> Compiz currently uses this library to handle frame drawing from
> metacity themes and I need to know whether I need to update the deps
> there.
Yes, that would be a consequence. (If we made it dual build then you'd
have to handle both which would be no fun at all.)
- Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]