On 28/07/10 15:48, Frederic Peters wrote: > Hello all, > > A few release team members talked with various people during the first > few days at GUADEC to get a better feeling of where we stand on our road > to GNOME 3.0. We held a meeting later and decided that GNOME 3.0 should > be postponed to March 2011 to make sure this release will have the high > quality we all expect. > > Our community wants to be proud of what we will release as 3.0, and > moreover, we don't want to disappoint our users who are excited about > our goals for GNOME 3.0. > > We will still release a stable version of GNOME in September, and we'll > call it 2.32. We encourage maintainers to add a configure flag to easily > make their modules use GTK+ 2 and GTK+ 3, or to create a gnome-2-32 > branch where the 2.32 work will be done. > > Thanks to the hard work the community has been doing in the last few > months, we have achieved a lot for GNOME 3 and we therefore want to also > release a GNOME 3 Beta in September. This will clearly send a signal > that we want people to start playing with GNOME 3, and this will help > build even more momentum before the release. > > Finally, it's important that everybody keeps focusing on making the > GNOME 3 vision a reality: the additional time that we have until March > 2010 should be used carefully and we encourage maintainers to target > achievable goals during this new cycle. > > > Cheers, > > Frederic Sorry I'm resurrecting the thread. I used part-GTK+ 3.0 desktop and I noticed that version no longer follows the migration (i.e. 2.31.5 of package uses GTK+ 3.0 but 2.31.6 uses GTK+ 2.0). May I propose that: Future 2.31.x/2.32.x uses GTK+ 2.0 Future 2.9x.x uses GTK+ 3.0 (especially if released along the 2.31.x/2.32.x) Regards PS. I'm sorry if similar proposal had passed - I haven't noticed it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature