Re: GNOME 3.0 in March 2011

On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 12:28 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> What I would recommend in that case is to create a 2.32 branch off
> 2.30, and move master to 2.90. But I would not worry too much about
> distributors, we can generally handle version discontinuities (even if
> it is not nice and requires epochs and such). 

That's precisely what I did for eog, and what I think makes better sense
(as long as you are not a library and don't cut off new features on
which other modules might already depend and use the version to check
for them, oh dear)


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]