Tomeu, We definitely need a non-CORBA gnome-speech replacement. Without that, we loose blind access to GNOME, which is used by quite a lot of people. The number of folks using GOK is far smaller... Inviting them to stay a bit longer on GNOME 2.30 may be an acceptable stop-gap... Regards, Peter Korn Accessibility Principal Oracle On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 15:09, Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net> wrote:Am Freitag, den 30.04.2010, 15:06 +0200 schrieb Andre Klapper:If you are a maintainer and plan to propose your module for inclusion in GNOME 3.0 but have not done yetPersonally I expected but have not yet seen proposals for * a GOK replacement[1] (caribou?) * a replacement for gnome-speech[2] (opentts?) * PyGI, but that's maybe too early[3]We are a bit short of time for following the process, given all the polishing still to do and some missing features. Do people think that it's very important to have it included in this release? Regards, Tomeu* gnome-activity-journal Note that this is only my very personal opinion and that I am not speaking on behalf of the release-team. andre [1] http://live.gnome.org/Accessibility/GNOME3#GOK_.28drop_for_GNOME3.29 [2] http://live.gnome.org/Accessibility/GNOME3#gnome-speech_.28drop_for_GNOME3.2C_supplant_with_SpeechDispatcher_or_SpeechDispatcher_fork.29 [3] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616733 -- mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list gnome org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list gnome org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list |