Re: fast-forward only policy

On 05/05/2009 04:12 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Behdad Esfahbod
<behdad esfahbod gmail com>  wrote:
case that's not a compelling argument; you can still have branches
'1-2' and 'gnome-2-26'.
Quick note.  If we're going to have short branch names (as I'm planning to
use for pango), it should be "1.2", not "1-2".

Yeap, IMHO pango-1-2<  1-2<  1.2<  stable

It's nice to have "stable", but we need a fixed name for those branches too. I'd love to see "stable" always be an alias for the latest stable branch, but that doesn't obviate the need for "1.2" or pango-1-2.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]