Re: fast-forward only policy

[Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>]

On 05/05/2009 04:12 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Behdad Esfahbod
> <behdad esfahbod gmail com>  wrote:
> > > > case that's not a compelling argument; you can still have branches
> > > > '1-2' and 'gnome-2-26'.
> > Quick note.  If we're going to have short branch names (as I'm planning to
> > use for pango), it should be "1.2", not "1-2".
>
> Yeap, IMHO pango-1-2<  1-2<  1.2<  stable

It's nice to have "stable", but we need a fixed name for those branches too. 
I'd love to see "stable" always be an alias for the latest stable branch, but 
that doesn't obviate the need for "1.2" or pango-1-2.

behdad