Re: Brasero improvements over the 2.26 release cycle
- From: Brian Cameron <Brian Cameron Sun COM>
- To: Philippe Rouquier <rouquier p wanadoo fr>
- Cc: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Brasero improvements over the 2.26 release cycle
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:21:46 -0600
Philippe:
As Luis said I'm not against relicencing the library (and even the whole
of brasero). It's just I wasn't aware of the issue at stake since I
don't care much about licencing (which turns out to be a mistake).
Regarding libbrasero-media, it shouldn't take long as I wrote all of the
code but the two backends for :
- FreeBSD but the copyright holder agreed to the licence change
- OpenSolaris and I'm waiting for the answer.
Given the size of the latter file, I can easily rewrite it if need be
but I don't think it'll be necessary.
A few questions:
- is using the same licence and wording as rhythmbox OK?
If Brasero uses GStreamer plugins directly, then GPL+exception would be
good for the the Brasero application.
LGPL seems a better choice for libraries that are intended to be used by
multiple applications. If you use LGPL, for such libraries an exception
is not needed.
Brian
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]