Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

["David L" <idht4n gmail com>]

2009/1/11 Josselin Mouette <joss debian org>:
> Le dimanche 11 janvier 2009 à 10:37 -0500, William Jon McCann a écrit :
>> 2009/1/11 Josselin Mouette <joss debian org>:
>> > So, there is no more GStreamer mixer? It is not possible to use any
>> > other backend than PulseAudio? It looks like an important regression to
>> > me.
>>
>> It is interesting to me how, for the last few years, the GNOME
>> community has taken to using the term regression where the term
>> progression should be used.
>
> Can you explain me how removing IEC958 support (to only talk of the
> example on the top of my head) is a progression?

I have two systems that don't work with pulseaudio.  Does this mean
that gnome is going to add dependencies that will break my audio?
In Fedora, I always have to "yum remove pulseaudio" for audio to work.
Will this remove a bunch of gnome components now?

Thanks,

              David