Re: JavaScript engines

["Alberto Ruiz" <aruiz gnome org>]

2009/1/6 Robert Carr <carrr rpi edu>:
> Another update, I've talked to Havoc in IRC. Seed is going to switch to
> the gjs/Vala format for enums (later today), and to the gjs import style.
> The remaining difference in the core bindings, is how signals are
> handled, and we've been discussing this with no conclusion yet, but in
> the not so far off future, some decision will be made on this.
>
> After that the two will be compatible in how they bind libraries, though
> all the aforementioned feature differences will still exist.

Hats off for you both guys on working together to achieve compatibility.

Another issue that might be worth taking into account is that you
should be consistent on how you document the bindings (tutorials,
examples, faqs) as this is how people would end up writing most of the
code. This could be a way to avoid incompatible code out there.

> ==============Original message text===============
> On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:13:32 EST "Matthias Clasen" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Jason D. Clinton <me jasonclinton com> wrote:
>
>>. After all,
>> both implementations run the same language with the same syntax and
>> they are *both* using the same underlying GObject bindings so the
>> API's will be the same.
>>
>
> This is the key question, isn't it. _Are_ the apis the same ?
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
> ===========End of original message text===========
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>



-- 
Un saludo,
Alberto Ruiz