Le lundi 05 janvier 2009 à 09:51 -0500, Dan Winship a écrit : > It seems pretty clear that the git-over-bzr solution doesn't make the > git users any happier than git-over-svn does, so let's not pretend that > it's any different from doing just bzr. So, given that we seem to have > sysadmin resources to do bzr, but we don't have sysadmin resources to do > git, the question we really need to answer is "do you prefer migrating > to bzr, or sticking with svn?". BTW, do we have the resources to migrate the repository to the SVN 1.5 format? It looks like, independently from other decisions, a quick and easy way to improve the situation – and to improve it right now, not in 2010. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=