Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results
- From: Cody Russell <bratsche gnome org>
- To: Robin Sonefors <ozamosi flukkost nu>
- Cc: Luca Ferretti <elle uca libero it>, Olav Vitters <olav bkor dhs org>, foundation-list <foundation-list gnome org>, David Zeuthen <david fubar dk>, desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results
- Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:27:09 -0600
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 23:16 +0100, Robin Sonefors wrote:
> > How much does it consume if it's a svn checkout? I heard (don't
> know
> > if it's true or not) git repo usually takes less diskspace then svn
> > checkout. This page seems to support this claim:
>
> A complete git repo is usually smaller than a complete SVN one
> (according to "common knowlege" - as in, I didn't run any benchmarks),
> but one commonly only checks out the /trunk subdirectory in
> subversion,
> while git usually checks out the whole project history, including all
> branches - it could be a substantial amount of data you don't check
> out
> with SVN.
I think Zeeshan is talking about working copies, not repositories. An
svn working copy stores two complete copies of each file in the repo;
one is the one that you see and edit, and one is in .svn/text-base
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]