Re: Tracker, Zeitgeist, Couchdb...where is the problem ?
- From: Alberto Ruiz <aruiz gnome org>
- To: Ross Burton <ross burtonini com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Tracker, Zeitgeist, Couchdb...where is the problem ?
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:09:08 +0100
2009/8/19 Ross Burton <ross burtonini com>:
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 11:23 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
>> i also think there is some mileage in using couchdb as the primary store
>> and just have tracker index that. one of the strengths of couchdb is its
>> mvcc architecture which means its completely corruption proof as updates
>> are always appended to the db and therefore cannot cause corruption of
>> existing data. that in itself makes it an excellent storage medium and
>> with all querying left to tracker and sqlite you can get the best of
>> both
>
> As couchdb only appends, would it be trivial to layer CouchDB on top of
> a VCS such as Monotone to get historical data for free? I can't think
> of any use-cases for this straight away but I'm sure someone can.
Oh the irony, this thread is turning into a bigger crack than the one
it was complaining about at the beginning.
> Ross
> --
> Ross Burton mail: ross burtonini com
> jabber: ross burtonini com
> www: http://burtonini.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>
--
Un saludo,
Alberto Ruiz
- References:
- Tracker, Zeitgeist, Couchdb...where is the problem ?
- Re: Tracker, Zeitgeist, Couchdb...where is the problem ?
- From: Thomas H.P. Andersen
- Re: Tracker, Zeitgeist, Couchdb...where is the problem ?
- Re: Tracker, Zeitgeist, Couchdb...where is the problem ?
- Re: Tracker, Zeitgeist, Couchdb...where is the problem ?
- Re: Tracker, Zeitgeist, Couchdb...where is the problem ?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]