On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:24 +0300, Xan Lopez wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Lennart Poettering<mztabzr 0pointer de> wrote: > > On Tue, 18.08.09 11:18, Jamie McCracken (jamie mccrack googlemail com) wrote: > > > >> > >> The indexer part is optional > >> > >> The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to > >> be used by zeitgeist > >> > >> If the consensus is that indexer is not suitable for inclusion then the > >> separate tracker-store should be considered for inclusion separately > >> > >> the store does not do any indexing or file monitoring nor does it cosume > >> significant resources > > > > I have no idea what "tracker-store" is. Please elaborate. It sounds as > > it was the database that is normally filled by the indexing data, but > > what could it be good for if you rip out the indexer? > > It can be used directly by applications that feed it data through an > API. Zeitgeist is an example, another could be bookmarks/history > storage in Epiphany. > > Xan Hmm. Is it one-in-all database? Then: - How you keep it out of corruption. Hardware and software errors happens and sometimes one lost files. If it is one file - ok I can live with it. If it is one-in-all file - ops (and please note that average user does not make backup). - Some fs makes operations with small files much more efficient then bigger (reiser* for example). It may have performance impact. - What with concurrent access? Regards
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part