Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog
- From: Tristan Van Berkom <tvb gnome org>
- To: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeenix gmail com>
- Cc: Cody Russell <bratsche gnome org>, gnome-infrastructure <gnome-infrastructure gnome org>, desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:26:14 -0400
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
<zeenix gmail com> wrote:
[...]
>
> Dude, we have moved to git and you are still talking of versioned
> ChangeLog and favoring large patches?
With a tool like git, you should be at least able to generate a single
reviewable patch, large or small, and thats reviewable, yes.
Versioned ChangeLog is a matter of trust, Id personally rather
take care of it and revision it by hand, I didnt ask other people
to do so, this is what I will do though (also, merging changes
in a ChangeLog cannot be difficlult, definitly not more difficult
than merging sources).
Cheers,
-Tristan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]